In the display above (click to enlarge), the colored lines show the times of SXT images that currently are on-line at ISAS. The purple lines are flare mode. The gaps will be considerably reduced when the NASA telemetry arrives and gets reformatted.
For a summary index listing of the weekly science reports, click here. Generally, these notes contain current research, or ideas related to current research in solar physics, as revealed by Yohkoh. They are done in "real time" and so they probably contain jargon, blunders, or trivialities. Of course they are not screened by referees! We are always happy when somebody writes a paper stimulated by one of these nuggets, and it happens fairly frequently. The SXT Chief Observers (most of the authors) do not have any proprietary rights to the data or ideas presented.
Coronal holes are the large-scale coronal features, where plasma density is extremely low and thus they look like a hole or a void of the corona. They are thought to be an area of open magnetic field and known as the base of high-speed coronal wind.
|
|
MPEG movie, 100 kbyte |
|
JavaScript movie, 2.3 Mbyte |
As one can see, the coronal loops along the length of the channel brighten in X-rays, implying that either heat or hot plasma is injected into those loops. The fact that this recurs several times over the course of a few days (only two episodes are depicted here) indicates that the event must not be too uncommon, and the flux tubes lying along that dimension of the filament channel must be fairly stable. Please note that after the loops brighten, they appear to stay hot for a few hours; this will be discussed below.
Do the flux tubes in question lie along the center of the filament channel, threading its axis like the "chewy nougat" phenomenon? Or do they lie on the outside, as part of the shell of field lines closing around the channel (like the X-ray image in the earlier nugget)? From this viewing angle it is difficult to know for sure, and risky to speculate, but either geometry requires the heating event to affect the entire length of the channel without catastrophically disrupting the magnetic stability. (Sound familiar?)
|
MPEG movie, 148 kbyte |
|
JavaScript movie, 2+ Mbyte |
The transient nature of the brightening is the difference image below: this shows the frame of 09:00:33 minus 08:48:11. The bright, wedge-shaped feature (lower arrow) has brightened in the intervening 12 minutes, while the rest of the loops north of that bright wedge have faded (particularly the dark smudge indicated by the upper arrow).
What does this have to do with the filament-creation theory mentioned above? Possibly nothing. They're both related to heat sources near the footpoints of long field lines, but the Antiochos & Klimchuk heating source was not described as so episodic as the brightenings we're monitoring here. Nonetheless, the observations would support the general plausibility of the mechanism they envisioned. And perhaps there is a connection to the "chewy nougats" -- hot, X-ray emitting cores which are sometimes observed inside otherwise dark filament cavities. Again, those brightenings are often less episodic than the current observations; but variations in the X-ray brightness of nougats have certainly been measured.
Have you detected jargon in this nugget?
For instant relief try
Dr. Strous's astrononomy glossary.
Still not getting it? Try AltaVista's Translation Service at http://babelfish.altavista.com/translate.dyn.
October 13, 2000
David McKenzie <mckenzie@isass0.solar.isas.ac.jp>