E-Print Archive

There are 4050 abstracts currently viewable.


Search:

Advanced Search
Options
Main Page Add New E-Print Submitter
Information
Feedback
News Help/FAQ About Preferences
Manage Key Phrase
Notification
Updated analytical solutions of continuity equation for electron beams precipitation. I. Pure collisional and pure ohmic energy losses View all abstracts by submitter

Valentina Zharkova   Submitted: 2015-08-14 10:35

We present updated analytical solutions of continuity equations for power-law beam electrons precipitating in (a) purely collisional losses and (b) purely ohmic losses. The solutions of continuity equation (CE) normalized on electron density presented in Dobranskis & Zharkova are found by method of characteristics eliminating a mistake in the density characteristic pointed out by Emslie et al. The corrected electron beam differential densities (DD) for collisions are shown to have energy spectra with the index of -(γ + 1)/2, coinciding with the one derived from the inverse problem solution by Brown, while being lower by 1/2 than the index of -γ/2 obtained from CE for electron flux. This leads to a decrease of the index of mean electron spectra from -(γ - 2.5) (CE for flux) to -(γ - 2.0) (CE for electron density). The similar method is applied to CE for electrons precipitating in electric field induced by the beam itself. For the first time, the electron energy spectra are calculated for both constant and variable electric fields by using CE for electron density. We derive electron DD for precipitating electrons (moving towards the photosphere, μ = +1) and 'returning' electrons (moving towards the corona, μ = -1). The indices of DD energy spectra are reduced from -γ - 1 (CE for flux) to -γ (CE for electron density). While the index of mean electron spectra is increased by 0.5, from -γ + 0.5 (CE for flux) to -γ + 1(CE for electron density). Hard X-ray intensities are also calculated for relativistic cross-section for the updated differential spectra revealing closer resemblance to numerical Fokker-Planck (FP) solutions.

Authors: R. R. Dobranskis and V. V. Zharkova
Projects: None

Publication Status: published: MNRAS, 2015,453 (1): 229-241
Last Modified: 2015-08-17 15:12
Go to main E-Print page  Comparison between the eruptive X2.2 flare on 2011 February 15 and confined X3.1 flare on 2014 October 24  Sunspot Rotation and the M-class Flare in Solar Active Region NOAA 11158  Edit Entry  Download Preprint  Submitter's Homepage Delete Entry 

Key
Go to main E-Print pageGo to main E-Print page.
Previous AbstractPrevious Abstract.
Next AbstractNext Abstract.
Download PreprintDownload Preprint.
Submitter's HomepageSubmitters Homepage.
Edit EntryEdit Entry.
View All Abstracts By SubmitterView all abstracts by submitter.
Delete AbstractDelete abstract.

Latest Entries
The Physical Nature of Spiral Wave Patterns in Sunspots
Predicting Solar Flares Using a Long Short-Term Memory Network
Coronal loop transverse oscillations excited by different driver frequencies
Solar Center-Limb Variation of the Strengths of Spectral Lines: Classification and Interpretation of Observed Trends
The plasmoid instability in a confined solar flare
High-frequency dynamics of active region moss as observed by IRIS
Extreme-ultraviolet Late Phase Caused by Magnetic Reconnection over Quadrupolar Magnetic Configuration in a Solar Flare
Two-step evolution of a rising flux rope resulting in a confined solar flare
Why torus-unstable solar filaments experience failed eruption?
The Magnetic Properties of Heating Events on High-Temperature Active Region Loops
Pulse-beam heating of deep atmospheric layers, their oscillations and shocks modulating the flare reconnection
A potential magnetic field calculator for solar physics applications using staggered grids
E and B polarizations from inhomogeneous and solar surface turbulence
Oscillations Accompanying a He I 10830 Å Negative Fare in a Solar Facula II. Response of the Transition Region and Corona
Flare reconnection-driven magnetic field and Lorentz force variations at the Sun's surface
Why Does the Solar Corona Abnormally Rotate Faster Than the Photosphere?
Impacts On Proton Fluxes Observed During Different Interplanetary Conditions
Coronal Loop Seismology Using Standing Kink Oscillations With a Lookup Table
Data-Optimized Coronal Field Model: I. Proof of Concept
Coronal Bright Points

Related Pages
MSU Solar Physics.
Max Millennium Science Mail Archive.
Max Millennium Message of the Day Mail Archive.
Max Millennium Flare Catalog

Archive Maintainer
Alisdair Davey



© 2003 Solar Physics Group - Montana State University