perhaps this group might be interested in yet another attempt to understand
the magnetic structure of bright transition region plasma? if so then read
on if you like.
I remain puzzled by the various opinions of what is going on, which is in
principle a good scientific position to be in. It might be useful to see
some renewed debate on what might be an important issue, or may be just
another solar curiosity. It's 6+ decades since Tousey and others acquired
uv spectra of the sun. if nothing else the paper below summarizes my own
current understanding. I can only guarantee that my understanding is
certainly flawed, nature is the final arbiter as always
best wishes,
Phil.
Your submission submit/3701776 has been assigned the permanent arXiv
identifier 2104.07753 and is available at:
http://arxiv.org/abs/2104.07753--
Philip Judge 303-775-9863
Senior Scientist, HAO, NCAR http://people.hao.ucar.edu/judge/homepage/
Dear loop community,
If you are interested, we would like to share a new paper on stereoscopic observations of loop cross sections that has recently been accepted to ApJ. https://arxiv.org/abs/2104.02722
The abstract is appended below.
Thank you,
Marika
====
Multi-spacecraft observations of coronal loops to verify a force-free field reconstruction and infer loop cross sections
Marika McCarthy, Dana Longcope and Anna Malanushenko
Abstract: Active region EUV loops are believed to trace a subset of magnetic field lines through the corona. Malanushenko et al. (2009) proposed a method, using loop images and line-of-sight photospheric magnetograms, to infer the three-dimensional shape and field strength along each loop. McCarthy et al. (2019) used this novel method to compute the total magnetic flux interconnecting a pair of active regions observed by SDO/AIA. They adopted the common assumption that each loop had a circular cross section. The accuracy of inferred shape and circularity of cross sections can both be tested using observations of the same loops from additional vantage points as provided by STEREO/EUVI. Here, we use multiple viewing angles to confirm the three-dimensional structure of loops. Of 151 viable cases, 105 (69.5%) matched some form of visible coronal structure when viewed approximately in quadrature. A loop with a circular cross-section should appear of a similar width in different perspectives. In contradiction to this, we find a puzzling lack of correlation between loop diameters seen from different perspectives, even an anti-correlation in some cases. Features identified as monolithic loops in AIA may, in fact, be more complex density enhancements. The 30.5% of reconstructions from AIA which did not match any feature in EUVI might be such enhancements. Others may be genuine loop structures, but with elliptical cross sections. We observe an anti-correlation between diameter and brightness, lending support to the latter hypothesis. Of 13 suitable for width analysis, four loops are consistent with non-circular cross sections, where we find anti-correlation in both comparisons.
--
Marika McCarthy
PhD Candidate | Montana State University
http://solar.physics.montana.edu/mimccart